Hey Anthony Hughes: Comment Spam is Ethically Bankrupt! Hey Mr. G: Comment Spammers Should Be Personally Injured!

Print This Post

You may also like...

15 Responses

  1. Al says:

    Thank you for the great article!

  2. Turk says:

    Thank you for a great article. I shall book mark it for later use.

  3. flounder says:

    Yeah. It's nice to see some real analysis.

  4. Dan Weber says:

    Really interesting, I will check this out!

  5. Joe says:

    Great post about the law. I found it to be very useful. I will have to bookmark your site for future reading.

  6. Jag says:

    Great teeth!

  7. Joe says:

    Oops, my made up url goes to a real site.

  8. Ken says:

    Wow, this response is totally unexpected.

  9. perlhaqr says:

    Ok, so, I guess I can sort of see the point of comment spam; if you're not leaving your shit smeared on blogs that use nofollow, it might actually bump your google ranking, and lead to an increase in business. But why do people still send email spam? Does anyone ever try to actually buy v1@gr4 from a misspelled email they got at random?

    Thanks for kicking a couple spammers in the nuts, Popehat guys.

  10. G Thompson says:

    The only comment SPAM that should be allowed is the Pythonesque type.. with a bit of Brie!


  11. louise says:

    I read an article on those Viagra spams – although the response rate is miniscule, it is sent to so many people that miniscule = big dollars. Those calculations assume that the Viagra they are selling is actually available for purchase: as we all know, it is often just a way to spread viruses, etc. So either you are stupid, or chicken.

  12. Rliyen says:

    This is extremely useful information! Very informative!

  13. Gideon says:

    Waste of bandwith.