Terrific! Radiant! Humble! [An Update]

Print This Post

You may also like...

7 Responses

  1. SPQR says:

    A well-deserved result.

  2. Victor Milan says:

    It is great news that official sanction might actually come down on prosecutorial misconduct.

    And … is "criminal libel" even a thing in this country? I thought that was a nastiness restricted to the UK.

  3. Will says:

    What are the likely sanctions for the prosecutor? Slap on the wrist? Or something more serious?

  4. Pete says:

    And here I am fresh from Greenfield's Simple Justice blawg, having left a fresh and steaming comment essentially ranting about how prosecutors can behave badly regardless of whether the behaviour is a part of their official duties or not, and get away with it scot-free.

    I don't understand – I don't have the case reference, but I distinctly remember a prosecutor successfully claiming immunity in response to a lawsuit filed because that prosecutor framed the defendant with knowingly false evidence. That's not part of their job at all – discretionary or otherwise.

    This is all confusing to the average Joe.

  5. Texan99 says:

    Criminal libel? I'm horrified to discover that there is such a thing.

  1. June 8, 2011

    […] toKen at Popehat for following this […]

  2. June 14, 2011

    […] rights and denied her qualified immunity. Blogger Ken of Popehat cited Erica's blog entry in his post about this excellent victory for a student's individual rights.Finally, Roger Freberg, writing for […]