The Popehat Signal: Calling Bloggers FOR GREAT JUSTICE

Print This Post

You may also like...

52 Responses

  1. I'm game, although I must warn you that the last time I took on a crazy person with a bunch of other bloggers, it was a helluva war for a very, very long time.

  2. Scott Jacobs says:

    Well, I don't have any readers, but I'd put one up anyways…

  3. Ken, we're always willing to help out.

  4. SPQR says:

    I've got access to a blog under another name and I can put something on Debunkers if appropriate.

  5. SPQR says:

    Oh, and we've got a long history of the dealing with the crazy at Debunkers, some of the famous crazy in fact. As an example, we ran into Deb Frisch before Protein Wisdom heard of her.

  6. Andrew says:

    Who doesn't want to support for great justice?

  7. Mike says:


  8. Nancy says:

    I'm game! My blog gets practically zero traffic and is sadly neglected, but if it'll help, I'm in!

  9. We're in. Holla atcha boy!

  10. Scott Jacobs says:

    Ken: "Popehat commenters! What is your profession?"

    The Masses: "SNARK! SNARK! SNARK!"

  11. Shay says:

    Rene Najera, who had to close down her blog when anti-vaxx loons began bombarding her employer with hate mail. You may be able to contact her via Orac at Respectful Insolence.

  12. Shay says:

    Oops. Completely misunderstood that post. That'll learn me to leave my glasses on when I'm reading.

  13. Bret says:

    I'm up for it.

  14. Unity says:

    I'll happily take a look at the situation and see if I can do anything to help.

  15. Joe Pullen says:

    Have pinged Mr. Rollins at the Legal Schnauzer blog to see if he can assist. He has faced similar situations in the past and his blog sees a fair amount of traffic.

  16. Sam Devol says:

    Curious… I'm in.

  17. Windypundit says:

    If we can help someone out, I'd like to hear about it.

  18. Reuben says:

    Cry "Havoc!" and release the dogs of blogging!

  19. Ken says:

    Thank you all very much. Watch for an email.

  20. AMB says:

    Blogger checking in. Happy to help if I can.

  21. Jag says:

    I don't have a blog, but I would be more than happy to utilize the comment spam skills I learned at Popehat.

  22. Do I have to be a lawyer? Or have an impressive rank on Alexa? Because if not, I'm down with great justice, too.

  23. Ken says:

    All bloggers are welcome.

  24. warren says:

    My blogs in the same shape as Scott and Nancy but if it'll help, I'm game.

  25. If a whore's help is welcome, count me in as well.

  26. Scott Jacobs says:

    If a whore's help is welcome, count me in as well.

    Why? Do you know some lawyers? :)

  27. Vidocq says:

    Tell me more!

  28. Hal_10000 says:

    Count me in, Ken. Delighted to lend my tiny voice to a good cause.

  29. Josh says:

    "There comes a time in the life of every human when he or she must decide to risk "his life, his fortune, and his sacred honor" on an outcome dubious. Those who fail the challenge are merely overgrown children, can never be anything else." -R. A. Heinlein

    My blog is mostly about beer and brewing, and I update it only infrequently, but I'll be damned if I let the cause of free speech go undefended! I'm in.

  30. Josh King says:

    I've got several blogs on unrelated topics, and a couple more I write for – I'm in.

  31. I might be able to help.

  32. Mara says:

    Only a small number of readers for my blog, but hell yeah, I'm in.

  33. Sue says:

    Sure, why not?

  34. Jack says:

    Anything to relive my supposed ennui. I'm in.

  35. SPQR says:

    Hey, if you got Tam, then you are golden.

  36. Laura K says:

    Hi Ken,

    I have a newly revived and very humble blog but I will do anything I can.

    Laura K

  37. Goober says:

    So I take it you've got enough bloggers for whatever cause it is that you are currently forwarding? because I got here a ltitle too late, apparently, and am curious now what this is all about.

    Can I help? My blog is small and poorly trafficked, but if I get to piss off censors, i'll fire it back up in a second…

  38. Dan says:

    Somehow I got here too late. I just caught up on my Popehat reading around midday yesterday. Now not knowing what this is all about is going to drive me nuts. I do have a non-law blog with modest traffic, for what it's worth.

  39. Sam Glover says:

    I'd like to know more, but I might be able to help out on Lawyerist.

  40. Andrew says:

    Ken, I have an advertising blog, which isn't much, but at least something. I could maybe find a hook with the TSA twitter as well.

  41. Ken says:

    I believe I have now emailed everyone who offered to help. Check your spam filters if you missed it. Send me an email at ken at popehat if you did not. Thanks so much.

  42. I appear to be late, but still willing to help if you need more blogs.

  43. If you still need more help, I can help. Professional writer/researcher (now very old political science candidate) with a solid legal background.

    If it is about Najera, I have some public health research background.

  1. March 31, 2012

    […] When she turned her attention to Kevin Padrick, there wasn't much he could do about it except take the traditional road of filing a lawsuit. While that was successful, the damage was done — and seemingly couldn't be undone. Other parties, who contacted me directly, told me of how they too had been victimized by her. Fortunately for her future victims, she decided to turn her attention to me. And fortunately for me, and her future victims, I have a strong belief in the superiority of using free speech to combat bad speech (without saying that other means are, per se, wrong). More fortunately, so do a lot of law bloggers. […]