Remember Steve Beirfeldt? He's the Ron Paul campaign staffer who was detained and interrogated by TSA employees in St. Louis for the crimes of carrying a bunch of cash and for, in effect, contempt of cop. TSA cops were outraged that Beirfeldt refused to tell them why he was carrying about $4,700 in cash, and that he insisted they clarify their basis for detaining him. The whole affair would have been swept under the rug, dismissed based on a he said/she said dispute over what happened, except for the fact that the TSA cops were so powerfully stupid they didn't notice that Beirfeldt was recording the whole thing on his phone. Armed with the evidence of TSA's treatment of Beirfeldt, the ACLU sued.
The new rules, issued in September and October, tell officers "screening may not be conducted to detect evidence of crimes unrelated to transportation security" and that large amounts of cash don't qualify as suspicious for purposes of safety.
Those are two propositions that were already perfectly clear as a matter of constitutional law, for all the good that did.
The ACLU is dropping the suit in response.
Good for Beirfeldt for standing up for the Fourth Amendment. Good for the ACLU for effectively representing him. Note that this continues to undermine the folks who have a Glenn-Beck-comic-book vision of what the ACLU does. I don't, by any means, agree with every legal or political stance they take, but they are an important and effective force in defending constitutional rights against government intrusion.
Last 5 posts by Ken White
- A Rare Federal Indictment For Online Threats Against Game Industry - July 28th, 2016
- John Hinckley, Jr. and the Rule of Law - July 27th, 2016
- Reverence For The Blue - July 21st, 2016
- Lawsplainer: Are Milo's Faked Tweets Defamatory? - July 20th, 2016
- Cynicism And Taking Clients Seriously - July 18th, 2016